The Clarion Issue

Counter Editorials and Opinions on Current Events and Attitudes


    Volume V, Issue V                                                           Sept/Oct 2004


WHY I’M NOT VOTING FOR GEORGE BUSH

By R. A. Pearson

During the 2000 campaign, then candidate George W. Bush sold 47% of the American voting public (and evidently 5 out of 9 US Supreme Court Justices) on a program that he called ‘compassionate conservatism.’ While Bush entered the presidency with even less a majority of the votes, he has acted as though he had a tremendous mandate for his programs from the American public. This year’s election will be a referendum on his performance in office and his vision for America.

One of the major issues in the election is the war in Iraq. President Bush convinced the American Congress and people that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and had been a major player in the 9/11 attacks on the United States. Recent revelations have shown both of these assumptions were incorrect. Administration insiders who have dared to speak out indicate that as Bush took office in 2001 he began to focus on Iraq. While President Bush refuses to admit that he ever made a mistake, his rhetoric has changed to emphasize the internal horror, terror, and brutality of Saddam Hussein’s regime. While post war examinations of Iraq have uncovered atrocities committed over the 30-year reign of Saddam Hussein, these horrors did not seem bother Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld as he delivered golden spurs to Saddam as a gift from Pres. Ronald Reagan or the Cheney linked Halliburton subsidiaries when they were selling weapons grade biological materials to Saddam’s Iraq in the 1980s.

While America won the war with Iraq, the occupation and nation building (talk about a flip-flop) in the Islamic nation has not been easy. Many Americans will remember Bush’s famous statement to the question of the possibility of insurrections in Iraq shortly after the ‘end of hostilities’ in the spring of 2003. Instead of a diplomatic statement like, “We hope for a peaceful transition so we can rebuild Iraq,” the president replied with a defiant challenge to any insurrectionist or terrorist with a gun or bomb, “Bring’em on.” Well folks, they came. The United States has lost over 1,000 service personnel killed and over 7,000 wounded in the war in Iraq. This does not include civilian personnel (cooks, truck drivers, etc.) working for military contractors that have been killed or injured. A vast majority of these causalities came after President Bush landed on an aircraft carrier and declared the war over under a banner declaring “Mission Accomplished.”

Today our military is in dire straits to meet the obligations placed on it by Bush’s unilateral foreign policy. Our troops are forced to stay in Iraq on extended deployments. National Guard units are called up and sent overseas for years at a time. Individual soldiers are forced to stay in the service well past their date of retirement (the stop loss order) and former servicemen who are out of the service and now in private life are being called back because the United States does not have enough soldiers. National leaders are discussing bringing back the draft to meet the need for soldiers. Perhaps this situation could have been averted if Bush had opted to build a truly viable international coalition instead of taking unilateral action in Iraq.

The war is currently costing the United States tax payer $5 billion a month and projections now show a $12.3 billion deficit in the Pentagon budget caused by the war (and money owed to Halliburton). Yet the Bush response continues to be a call for continued, and even more tax cuts in America.

The economy has suffered greatly under President Bush. Under Bush the United States has lost over 2.7 million good paying jobs, especially in industry and manufacturing. The Bush Administration’s reaction followed the typical Republican philosophy of a tax cut. In theory this allows more money for investment in American industry, thus creating jobs (the trickle down concept). However, the investment of American cash in industry is now going overseas to Asia where people work much cheaper. Very little money is going into American industry or manufacturing and more jobs are being outsourced overseas. The two million jobs by the end of 2004 that Pres. Bush promised to create in the Spring of 2004 have not materialized (only 32,000 were created in July 2004), and the jobs that have been created are lower paying service sector jobs that often come without basic benefits such as health care. Today there are over 8.2 million (5.5%) unemployed Americans looking for work. On August 5, 2004, President Bush promised “not to rest until every American who wanted a job had one.” That same weekend, he went on a family vacation to Kennebunkport, Maine, for rest and the wedding of his nephew, George P. Bush, the son of Florida’s Gov. Jeb Bush. A jobless recovery does not help if you don’t have a job!

When Bush took office in January 2001, the US government had a $5.6 billion dollar surplus. The Bush tax cuts, the War with Iraq, and growth in the size of the federal government, coupled with the tax revenue lost during the Bush recession, has presented the federal government with a deficit for as far as the eye can see. The projected deficit for 2004 is 445 billion dollars. Pres. Bush has spent the United States into a seven trillion-dollar national debt, the largest debt in our nation’s history. That folks is an average of $1.73 billion per day. Most nonpartisan economists agree that the only part of the economy that has grown during the Bush presidency has been the national debt. Do the wealthiest two percent of Americans really need all the tax cuts doled out by the Bush tax cut plan?

The Bush campaign has accused Democratic candidate John Kerry, its major opponent in this election, of ‘flip-flopping’ on major issues over the last 20 years. While John Kerry has changed his position on issues over the years, it is important to note that Kerry has cast some 200 votes per year over the last 20 years, and has slowly changed his mind on policies and issues over those years. Meanwhile Bush has flip-flopped on many major policy issues over the last four years, leaving America, and the world, wondering where he stands on several issues. Here are a few Bush flip-flops:

1) During Bush’s run in the 2000 election Bush said, “What I think the president ought to do [when gas prices spike] is he ought to get on the phone with the OPEC cartel and say we expect you to open your spigots...And the president of the United States must jawbone OPEC members to lower the price.” Where are Bush’s jawboning and lower prices now?

2) Bush wanted to place Ahmed Chalabi at the head of the ‘liberated Iraqi government.’ He was the president’s special guest at the 2004 State of the Union address. By May of 2004, Bush approved the raid of Chalabi’s house where documents and computers were seized, although Bush knew about Chalabi’s ties to Iran before Bush tapped him to be the designated Iraqi leader in 2003.

3) Bush initially opposed the Department of Homeland Security in March of 2002. By June he had ‘flip flopped’ on the issue and approved the new department.

4) On Sept. 17, 2001, Bush issued a Texas style OSAMA WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE WARRANT. Bush emphasized, “I want justice.” However by March 2002, after many failed attempts to capture the allusive al-Queda leader, President Bush stated, “I don’t know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him. I truly am not that concerned about him.”

Other Bush flip-flops include: appointing the 9/11 Commission, National Security Advisor, Dr. Condoleezza Rice testifying before the 9/11 Commission, Bush and Cheney appearing before the 9/11 Commission, summits regarding North Korea, funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Free Trade, UN votes, the McCain-Feingold bill, and flip-flops (or simply ignoring) many environmental issues. Of course Bush would never bow to political pressure or opinion polls.

Under Pres. Bush health care reforms have been almost nonexistent. While the Medicare Prescription Drug Plan has been passed, the plan has proven to be convoluted and virtually annulled by the rising cost of medications. The plan does not allow the government to buy prescriptions in bulk from low bidders, and the importation of cheaper medications from Canada has been stifled. Meanwhile the cost of hospitalization, doctor visits, and medical testing has risen at a disproportional rate to inflation. At the same time private health care plans have raised their rates and cut back the services and medications they cover at an alarming rate. Most middle class Americans would see their life savings wiped out by a catastrophic illness. While Bush provided the citizens of the new Iraq with a national health care plan, he refuses to help American citizens obtain even affordable health care or medications. Over 45 million American citizens do not have health insurance, and at least five million Americans have lost their health care under Pres. Bush.

Pres. Bush is the only recent president to spend a large amount of his time in office defending himself from criticisms by former members of his administration. Several key administration officials have resigned in frustration over Bush policies. These officials include: Paul O’Neill, Sec. of the Treasury, Christine Whitman of the EPA, Thomas Scully, Medicare and Medicaid Administrator, Otto Reich, Special envoy to Latin America, William Farish, Ambassador to Great Britain, Gen. Anthony Zinni, Rand Beers and Richard Clarke of the National Security Council, and David Key, a weapons inspector. All of these individuals have written books, newspaper and magazine articles, and given interviews, describing the narrow mindedness, tunnel vision, and even the arrogance of the Bush administration over the last four years.

The most dastardly incident involving internal criticisms of the Bush administration was the ‘leak’ naming Valerie Plame as a CIA operative. Plame is the wife of Joseph Wilson, former US Ambassador to Gabon and Iraq. Wilson was critical of Bush’s 2003 State of the Union speech that tied Saddam Hussein to weapons grade uranium from Niger. Wilson exposed the Bush disinformation in an article entitled “What I Didn’t Find in Africa” that ran in major newspapers across America and received tremendous coverage on network and cable news shows. In July 2003, the White House “leaked” the information concerning Valerie Plame to syndicated columnist Robert Novak. Novak indicated that two senior administration officials gave him the agent's name. The White House investigation into the leak has turned up nothing. It is apparent that the Bush administration seeks only the counsel of those who agree with their prospective on national and international affairs.

Pres. Bush’s hard right stands have divided America and even the moderates his party. His ‘Defense of Marriage Amendment,’ designed to amend the Constitution to take away rights, did not survive a procedure vote in the US Senate. His restrictions on stem cell research, that some day might help cure Alzheimer’s and other diseases, is seen by many Americans of all parties as too restrictive.

The Bush administration persists on labeling all that disagree with them as ‘terrorist’ or ‘unpatriotic.’ Congressmen and Senators who vote against a bill, such as the American Patriot Act or funding for the War on Terror are labeled unpatriotic regardless of the reason for their vote. In February 2004, Bush’s Sec. of Education Rod Paige called the National Education Association (NEA), a 2.7-million-member Professional Organization representing many of the nation's teachers, a “terrorist organization” because the organization opposed the Bush No Child Left Behind Act. Any opposition to any Bush plan or program is met with name-calling, labeling, and other various types of ridicule and mockery.

In the election of 1980, then candidate Ronald Reagan, the man who built the current Republican Party and ideology, introduced the American people to the ‘misery index.’ Reagan asked the American public ‘Are you better off now that you were four years ago?’ Now ask yourself these questions for our Clarion Issue 2004 Misery Index Poll.

1.
2. How have my investments (stocks, mutual funds, CDs, bank accounts, bonds, 401Ks. 403Bs and IRAs) faired over the last 4 years. Have I made any real money in these funds for my retirement?
3. Do I feel my 401k, 403B and IRA retirement accounts are safe from corporate greed and misuse? (Remember Enron and other corporate scandals and bankruptcies these last 4 years that wiped out retirement accounts, stock portfolios, and 401Ks.)
4. Has my children’s college savings funds grown by 20% these last 4 years. College tuition and expenses have gone up that much.
5. How is my health plan lately? Does it cover what it did 4 years ago? Do I pay more for a doctor visit and prescriptions? Has the cost of health insurance, prescriptions and health care gone up in relation to inflation (2%) or has it gone up more?
6. Have my elderly relatives (parents, aunts, and uncles) done well on their retirement these last 4 years or has their spending power gone down?
7. Did I really profit from the Bush tax cuts or did the tax cuts go to the ‘haves and have mores’ (Bush’s words, not the Clarion Issue’s). Will my children have to pay for the deficits run up by Bush’s wars and tax cuts?
8. Who really profited from the Iraq war? Was it the common American or big business like Halliburton, and big oil and energy companies? Has gas gone down like Bush promised it would? Was the war with Iraq worth the cost in American lives and billions of dollars of debt?
9. Has the Bush administration’s alienation of our allies helped or hurt our ability to win the global war on terror?
10. Has the Bush administrations preemptive attack on Iraq made us safer or has it created a new generation of terrorists to take arms against us.
Has ‘No Child Left Behind’ really improved my child’s school? Or is it another underfunded mandate burdening local school systems with unreasonable regulations and high stakes testing?

Finally, over forty years ago, as President John F. Kennedy was rallying support from America’s allies during the Cuban missile crisis, General Vernon Walters was sent to Paris with the U-2 photographs of the Cuban missile bases The General offered to show the photographs to French President Charles De Gaulle. De Gaulle waved Gen. Walters away saying, “I do not need your photographs, Walters. This is serious, and when the United States asks France for her support on a serious matter, she will give it. Just tell me what you want France to do.” Then he added, “France does not need evidence to take the word of the president of the United States.” Ask yourself, would any world leader accept President Bush’s word today?

It is my firm belief that America needs a different vision, a different hand on the helm, to meet the challenges it faces at home and abroad. On November 2nd, instead of voting for the incumbent, I think I’ll reach for another lever.



WHY I’M SUPPORTING PRESIDENT BUSH
By Sam Merier

Here we go again. In a few short weeks we will have a very serious decision to make as we exercise our ULTIMATE Right in Freedom. That is to vote. Voting in America is the one direct way we as citizens participate in our democracy and express our beliefs and opinions to our elected officials. The sad state of affairs is that the majority of the populace are usually led by the minority, the people that actually vote. Please take the time to vote in this and every election.

Now here are some of the reasons I have decided to support President Bush. Bush has demonstrated and maintained decisive leadership in the security of our country. Since 9/11 there have been no further successful attacks by terrorists on American soil. Some people consider the War on Terror and Homeland Security to be useless, but President Bush puts the safety and security of our country first and foremost. He said if the rest of the world will not help us then we must do it ourselves. Who is responsible for the safety and security of our nation? Certainly not the rest of the world. Remember, it was France, other countries, and perhaps the UN, that profited under the abuses of “the Food for Crude” program. A successful win for America in the war in Iraq will do more to restore faith in America and security in the world. Perhaps if the media were not so anti-President Bush, and would show more of the successes of the American and coalition forces instead of the successes of the terrorists, there would not be so much doubt.

President Bush removed the oppressive Taliban from power in Afghanistan and allowed the Afghani people to elect a popular government. It was the Taliban that had provided state sponsored sanctuary for Osama bin Laden, his al-Queda organization and al-Queda’s terrorist training camps. Surely this was a positive reaction to the 9/11 attacks.

Pres. Bush removed Saddam Hussein from power. Saddam Hussein was a threat to the people of Iraq and to the rest of the world. Once again most people would have to agree that the world is a better place without Saddam Hussein in power? One must also understand, that the war in Iraq is about containment of terrorism since many of the opposition forces (terrorists) in Iraq are clearly from elsewhere in the Islamic world.

Taxes and tax cuts are not just for the rich as so many would like for you to believe. No economy has ever made it to prosperity by taxing the people to the poorhouse. Reduction of the tax rate, by President Bush on low-income families from 15 % to 10 % is often overlooked. It is your money! You earned it, and you should be keeping more of it.

President Bush has also helped middle income Americans prepare for college costs by increased the annual contribution limit on Educational IRAs from $500 to $2,000 per child.

President Bush refused to allow the UN to inspect/monitor the 2002 elections. This is America and a sign of the success of the far left in wanting and approving such to be done. (What will they want the UN to do next on American soil? Why don’t they get the UN to pay all of the parking tickets owed to the city of New York? Or get the members that have never paid the U.S. back from WWI and/or at least WWII and other loans to pay the US back?)

President Bush banned federal aid to international family planning groups that offer abortions with other independent funds. As tight as money is in the US for social programs and Americans usually want to help people in America first, isn’t this a great thing? It is unless one is pro-abortion.

President Bush has increased spending for the Veterans Administration, and raised the pay for US service personnel. He has also increased spending for the Troops to Teachers program. I would think that most American taxpayers would rather support our troops and veterans than fund international abortions.

President Bush has restored faith in our economy. After the disastrous attacks on 11 Sept 2001 by terrorists on the WTC, a simple but most important fact was ignored or unrealized by a lot of people, that is the economic impact of the attacks. It was the primary goal of the terrorists to ruin America economically. The total destruction of the WTC was a bonus to them. Think of how many people were employed there alone, and how at least some of those people were responsible for other companies elsewhere. Many national and international corporate offices were located there. Also consider the impact on the total shutdown of commercial aviation. Not just one or two flights were shut down, but all of them. Think of how many people that affected directly or indirectly and the money involved. True many people lost jobs, but jobs are coming back. The economy has greatly improved compared to what it was, and it is continuing to improve albeit not always as fast as people would like. The economy is rebounding and inflation is in check.

President Bush has brought moral dignity back to the White House. Perhaps some people will take that to mean nothing and liked or ignored the idea of the insult and shame that was made to the White House and to America by the former president. I am not one of them.

I believe that President Bush has done and will do a better job than his opponents. History has clearly and repeatedly continued to demonstrate that it is not wise “to change horses in midstream.” It is something that should also be seriously considered when one goes to vote, especially when one considers the proven, documented, and demonstrated history and record of his opponents.

 


SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING AND CONCERNS IN THE 21ST CENTURY

By Hampton Blount

In dealing with the subject of funding special education there are a myriad of angles and perspectives that must be addressed. We must view the federal aspect of funding. We must view the grave fiscal impact on local districts. We must explore the personal costs to the individual families. Special education is funded by a combination of these entities. Some social critics would suggest special education is not funded by combination of these entities.

In discussing funding of special education all discourse must begin with the Individual’s with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This act guarantees access to appropriate education to every student in the United States; regardless of disability. This means that no matter how challenging a student is to serve in a meaningful way, the local school system must endeavor to provide the best possible opportunity. That does not mean placing a student in the most appropriate existing program. If a program that could reasonably be expected to service a particular student does not exist the local school system must create it. If this means contracting with private education firms to meet a particular student’s needs or paying for an unusual therapy the local school system must make it happen.

So while the IDEA is broad and all encompassing in the demand it places on local school systems it is much less comprehensive in providing funding. When IDEA was initially passed, a goal of forty percent was stated. This meant that the federal government would work towards reimbursing local districts for forty percent of the additional costs in education special needs students. The reality of IDEA has been considerably short of the ideal. The true report would place IDEA spending at a consistent fifteen to twenty percent. In essence IDEA while brilliant and essential in many ways falls under the heading of “under funded federal mandate.”

Over the last several years there have been many colossal confrontations in the United States Senate over the idea of adequately funding IDEA. One of the most closely followed breaks in the Senate occurred over conflicts related to IDEA funding. Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords left the Republican Party in 2001. While Jeffords had many moderate viewpoints that frequently placed him at odds with his republican contemporaries, the preverbal straw that broke the camel’s back proved to be Jeffords tenacious insistence on adequate IDEA funding. Jeffords was one of congress’ principal authors of the 1975 version of IDEA. When President Bush’s final budget request for 2001 included $200 billion in tax cuts and a decrease in “real” money, Jeffords knew it was time for him to part with the GOP.

Many critics have cited this critical lack of funding behind the mandate as the central difficulty various states face in putting together their educational budgets. New Hampshire for instance, has no income tax or sales tax; schools are principally paid for on the basis of property tax. This places property taxes on a $100,000 house at more than $6,000 a year. The governor of New Hampshire cites the federal government’s under funding of IDEA as a decisive issue in many communities. New Hampshire was also the home of a radical illustration of the tragedy that the federal government is consistently under funding IDEA. In Nelson, New Hampshire a small school district with a total educational budget of $700,000 became a lightening rod. A student with autism and schizophrenia required more than $200,000 a year in services. Town officials sued the state for reimbursement. Eventually the state of New Hampshire agreed to pick up the tab for students whose educational cost exceeded three and a half times the state average.

This short fall in a required program means that some entity will have to make up the difference. The burden falls first to state governments. With increasing deficits and decreasing revenue, the lack of federal funding for special education has been an especially difficult burden. Oklahoma serves as a good example to the precarious position state governments find themselves. With a five percent deficit facing Oklahoma lawmakers in 2003, they were forced to make a variety of difficult decisions. Pre-collegiate education was cut by 56.3 million dollars. Much of this cut came from special education programs. For instance, 5.6 million dollars was saved by closing down all the state regional educational centers. These centers served local districts in identifying students needing special education intervention. The legislature also trimmed an $842,000 program that provided specialized testing for difficult to assess students. Another million dollars was removed from the budget that would have provided service to the homebound students. Also significant was the trimming of staff development money by fifty-four percent. So while the state provided less assistance in local district’s efforts to comply with IDEA the requirements remained the same. If these programs must exist and the federal government does not pay for them, and state governments cannot pay for them, it remains that local systems will have to pay for them.

Another state that illustrates these tenacious problems is California. The State legislature in California has dealt with three consecutive budget deficits. When the flow of cash is constricted this seriously there is an inevitable effect of every priority needing to be justified. While some priorities have well healed champions, IDEA funding seems to be underrepresented when the legislative pie is being divided.

According to the National Education Association’s website the average cost for educating a student is $7,552.00. The average cost for educating a special education student is $16,921.00. This is a $9,369.00 per student difference. That difference in cost adds up to a ten billion-dollar shortfall for local districts.

This creates the fore mentioned difficulty. If a system is required by federal law to fund a variety of programs with inadequate assistance from the government, instant conflict and difficulty is created for the local district.

The economic impact on local districts is well exampled by Connecticut’s East Lyme School District. The cost of this district’s special education programs for the 2003 school year was $900,000. Between state and federal funding the district received $540,000. This left a relatively small school district attempting to find $360,000. The district solved the problem by implementing a variety of cost saving measures. The district instituted a hiring freeze, abolished the fourth grade music program, and stopped purchasing new textbooks.

The final entity that must pay whatever special education costs have not been paid by the various governments is the actual family unit of the special needs child. It is estimated that about ten percent of US households have a child with some level of special needs.

The Pacer center, a Minneapolis based group that serves in an advocacy capacity for special needs students and their families, asserts that six and one-half million students in the United States of America are diagnosable for a special need. This adds up to a lot of families studying best options.

While the ability of individual families to make up short falls and the cost of education varies greatly, a consistent fact is the tremendous hardship it frequently is. It is not uncommon for parents of students who suffer from autism to spend tens of thousands of dollars on Applied Behavioral Analysis treatment (ABA). This therapy is frequently not reimbursed by insurance. Often time’s school districts don’t consider it a part of a reasonable effort at education even though it has been proven highly effective. The only alternative left to parents is to pay for the treatment themselves. A full year’s ABA treatment regiment can cost $30-50,000. One can easily imagine how this could wreck a family’s finances. Currently only two states, Massachusetts and New Jersey have catastrophic childhood illness relief funds. This plan allows families to qualify for help if a child’s unreimburseable medical expenses exceed ten percent of a family’s gross income.

In his article, “Special needs, crushing costs,” Gunther outlines the history of Larry and Joni Jones. The Jones’ have two sons with Asperger Syndrome. They spent $200,000 in out of pocket expenses for a wide variety of treatments and therapies for their children. This is in addition to the hundreds of thousands of dollars the local school system kicked in each year.

In another article on the burdensome costs of special education to families called Special Needs, Crushing Costs, Gunter explains several strategies to help ease the financial burden for the families of special education students. The first idea that Gunter proposes is prescriptions. Gunter suggests that you get some medical or mental health professional to write a prescription for every treatment and or therapy you will utilize. Insurance companies are less inclined to decline a course of action that was suggested by a Dr. than one that was “prescribed” by just a parent.

The next idea that Gunter suggests is to have your insurance company assign a permanent caseworker to handle your particular situation. Many people report finding this to be more efficient than catching a new rep up to speed with each and every call.

The third idea that Gunter puts forward as a way to simplify life for the families of special needs students is to apply for a Medicare waiver. In special instances when expenses are ridiculously high the government has a program in place to waive the regular requirements of Medicare. The final idea that Gunter offers is to carefully maintain a clear record of all of your child’s medical expenses. If the total exceeds 7.5% of your income then you are permitted to deduct said amount from your federal income.

A logical approach to solving the funding issues involved with education would be the abolition of state Departments of Education. It would be a preferable system for all taxing on behalf of education to be done at the federal level. Local and state governments would collect no money for education thus they would dispense none. Local districts would exist to operate the local schools but funding would not be their concern.

A formula should be put in place that provides a certain amount of funding for each student. Special needs students would necessarily receive more funding for the district than regular educational students. Funding would be removed as a differentiating factor in various school systems. Every individual school would be funded fairly based on the number of and the characteristics of the students at said schools. This method would also be beneficial in that it would make taxation less confusing. Currently a portion of an individual’s property tax, a portion of their state income tax, and a portion of their federal income tax all fund education. Under the new method every citizen would pay a federal education tax. There would be less confusion about what tax was supposedly paying what government service.

Of course there would some details to work out. First of all, some areas of the country are more expensive than others. In addition to the base formula the government would also have to employ a “cost of living index” for education. It costs more to give a student the same education in New York that could be had for less in Alabama. This would have to be considered. The second and more fatal difficulty facing this approach to educational funding would be the idea of state’s rights. It is altogether unlikely one would find a single state eager to give up control of educational funding to the Washington bureaucracy. I suspect this sort of idea would be laughably absurd to a great many conservative and moderate politicians. While the sort of complete change to the way education is funded seems unlikely some change in inevitable. The current system is a patchwork of various policies that leave grievous gaps.

For more information see:

Crowley, M. (2001). Switch Hit [Electronic version]. New Republic, 225,13-14.

Galley, M. (2003). Special Education Bears Brunt of State Aid Cuts [Electronic version]. Education Week, 23, 26.

Gutner, T. (2004). Special Needs, Crushing Costs [Electronic version]. Business Week, 3885, 94-97.

Sack, J. (2001). Spec. Ed. Costs Can Be Taxing For Districts [Electronic version]. Education Week, 19, 1-4.

Shreve, D., Smith, S. (2003). Debunking the Myths of Special Education [Electronic version]. StateLegislatures, 29, 19-21.


“BRING ’EM ON” A CLARION ISSUE WAR UPDATE
CASUALTIES AS OF SEPT. 12, 2004

US SERVICE PERSONNEL KILLED IN IRAQ ……….. 1,007

US SERVICE RERSONNEL WOUNDED IN IRAQ ……….. 7,040

US SERVICE PERSONNEL KILLED IN AFGHANISTAN…….. 131

US SERVICE PERSONNEL WOUNDED IN AFGHANISTAN……. 496

TOTAL CASUALTIES ……………………………….. 8,674

TOTAL COST ……… $132,220,500,000

 


 

Humor Us           Back to Top

GEORGIA GIRLS

Three men were sitting together bragging about how they had set their new wives straight on their duties.

The first man had married a woman from Pennsylvania. He bragged that he had told his wife she was going to do all the dishes and house cleaning that needed done at their house. He said that it took a couple of days but on the third day, he came home to a clean house and the dishes were all washed and put away.

The second man had married a woman from Ohio. He bragged that he had given his wife orders that she was to do all the cleaning, dishes, and the cooking. He told them that the first day he didn't see any results, but the next day it was better. By the third day, his house was clean, the dishes were done, and he had a huge dinner on the table.

The third man had married a Georgia girl. He boasted that he told her his house was to be cleaned, dishes washed, the cooking done and laundry washed. And this was all her responsibility. He said the first day he didn't see anything. And the second day he didn't see anything. But by the third day some of the swelling had gone down so he could see a little out of his left eye!

PHONE PROBLEMS

An elderly lady phoned her telephone company to report that her telephone failed to ring when her friends called, and that on the few occasions when it did ring, her pet dog always moaned right before the phone rang. The telephone repairman proceeded to the scene, curious to see this psychic dog or senile elderly lady.

He climbed a nearby telephone pole, hooked in his test set, and dialed the subscriber's house. The phone didn't ring right away, but then the dog moaned loudly and the telephone began to ring.

Climbing down from the pole, the telephone repairman found:

1. The dog was tied to the telephone system's ground wire via a steel chain and collar.

2. The wire connection to the ground rod was loose.

3. The dog was receiving 90 volts of signaling current when the phone number was called.

4. After a couple of such jolts, the dog would start moaning and then urinate on himself and the ground.

5. The wet ground would complete the circuit, thus causing the phone to ring.

Which demonstrates that some problems CAN be fixed by pissing and moaning.


SPEAKIN’ SOUTHERN

A SOUTHERN LOOK AT ELECTION 2004

J’vote? – Did you vote?

Nat/shion/nel debt – Money the government owes to somebody like one of them

A’rab Sheiks or to Hally/burr/ton (Halliburton).

High/breed car – What ya get when you cross a class/sick (classic) car like a Z-28

with Bubba’s mor/de/fried (modified) 1994 Chevy S-10.

Blue State— A state where them voter folks go into the polls, read the ballot and

vote for that Kerry feller.

Red State— A state where them voter states go into the polls, read the ballot and

vote for that Bush feller.

Redneck State— A state where them voter folks go into the polls and are so

ig/ner/rant (ignorant) they can’t read the ballot.

Tax cut— A cut that is worser than an ax cut.

OPEC— Something the eye doc/ter (o/pec/tic/shion) gives ya so you can’t see the prices at the gas pump.

Usage:

Bubba— “Hey Skeeter! J’vote?”

Sketter— “Yea Bubba, I sho’ nuff did.”

Bubba— “Who’d ya vote fer?”

Skeeter— “I ah voted fer that thar Nader feller. He promised everybody ah organic

chickun in every pot and ah highbreed car in every garage.”

Bubba— “Gee Skeeter, I thought they man/u/fractured cars. I didn’t know they

breed ‘em.”

* * * * * *

Linda Lou (a talkin’ on the tel/lee/phone) — “Hey Ruthey Belle, ya’ll a watchin’ the

‘lection returns.

Ruthey Belle— “Naw, Billy Ray’s a watchin’ a football game. Who’s ahead?” Linda Lou— “Well, that there Kerry guy has 10 Blue States, and that there Bush

feller has 10 Red States.”

Ruthey Belle— “How’d Are/kain/saw (Arkansas) vote?”

Linda Lou— “Oh, we’s what they’s a callin’ a Redneck state.

Ruthey Belle— “How come that?”

Linda Lou— “They can’t tell how we ah voted yet. Seems like a lot’a us’en

Are/kain/saw folkes figuered them there new fancy votin’ ma/cheens was ATMs

and voted for $100. Them voter folks is sho’ ‘nuff ig/ner/rant”

Ruthey Bell — “Well, they’ll probably say them’s Bush votes, cause of all his tax

cuts.”

Linda Lou — “Well, I reckon it beats an ax cut. Who’s a winnin’ the football

game?”

Ruthey Bell — “I don’t a know. It’s Toe/lee/der (Toledo) again’ Miami of Ohio at

Yager stadium.”

Linda Lou— “Lordy Ruthy Belle. Them mens of us’ens will watch anything.”

* * * * *

Goober— “Slick, ya seen the prices at th’ gas pump.”

Slick— “Naw Gube, I use these here OPECs. I got’em from the o/pec/tic/shion. They’s sorta like blinders for a mule. Ya don’t see the price, but ya can still get $5 worth.”

Did He Say That?

“We need an energy bill that encourages consumption.”

Pres. George W. Bush, Sept. 23, 2003




Clarion Issue Briefs
The South

Back to Top

TEXAS COPS CREATE HAVOC IN MAJOR HIBISCUS BUST

Police in Houston, Texas, caused major havoc in a northwest Harris County neighborhood when they raided the home of Blair Davis, a landscaper, in early August. In what turned out to be a major embarrassing raid, the police seized Texas Star hibiscus plants that Davis was growing in his yard mistaking the plant for marijuana.

According to Davis, “All of a sudden, they burst in with their guns loaded, pointing at me, screaming, 'Get on the floor! Get on the floor!' I just put my head down, shook it and said: 'Guys, you are making a terrible mistake. That is Texas Star hibiscus, not marijuana.' But they just told me to shut up.” Later in the raid, the officers discussed whether the bamboo in the window might be pot as well and they also asked him what he planned to do with the watermelons and cantaloupes growing out back.

The Texas cops, however, thought they'd made a major drug bust when they raided the home northwest of Houston on August 3, 2004. After all, it looked like there were huge marijuana plants growing in the front yard.

The tall plants with the narrow leaves arranged in a fan pattern were not pot plants at all, but specimens of Texas Star hibiscus plants that Davis grows for his landscaping business.

The police were acting on a tip from a concerned citizen who had seen the hibiscus plants, thought they were marijuana, and tipped off the authorities. The Texas Star hibiscus has little white flowers and smooth green leaves while marijuana has rough leaves and dense flowering buds. While the neighbor may have made a mistake, the police should have known the difference. However, Police spokesman Lt. Dan Webb said, “My guys went out there, and they looked at the plants and stuff, and they believed them to be marijuana.”

After about an hour, the officers decided the search was over and gave Davis a “citizen's information card” with the words “closed-report” written on it. Lt. Webb continued to defend his officers saying, “I'm sure it was traumatic, Any time there's a search warrant served at your house, there's gonna be some trauma involved.”

But Davis complained that there was “No apology, no nothing. I realize they have a job to do, but this seems a little bizarre.” Davis believes the police need a little more training. “If they don't know what a marijuana plant looks like, maybe they should bring a picture with them before they invade a citizen's home.”



SOCIAL WORK DISRUPTED BY EXPLODING PANTS

Three Walker County social workers in LaFayette, Georgia, were visiting Daniel Gabriel Doyle, 39, on August 3, 2004, when his pants exploded as he sat in their car filling out paperwork. Apparently, Doyle had combined red phosphorus and iodine, two chemicals used to make methamphetamine, in a film canister and stuck the canister in his pocket when the social workers showed up.

According to Patrick Stanfield, commander of the Lookout Mountain Judicial Circuit Drug Task Force, Doyle “ kept fiddling with his front right pants pocket. All of a sudden, a loud bang happened, and fire shot from his pocket. It damaged the inside of the state vehicle and burned clothing on the case workers.”

The reaction of the two chemicals heats up to about 278 degrees Fahrenheit before exploding, Stanfield said, “He didn't know what he was doing, and it started boiling on his leg.”

The Clarion Issue plans to nominate Doyle for a “Darwin Award.” The Darwin Award given for abject stupidity to those who are too dumb to live long enough to pass on their genes.

 


PUPPY CLAIMS SELF DEFENSE IN FLORIDA SHOOTING

Jerry Allen Bradford (37) of Pensacola, Florida, was shot in the arm by a puppy as he was trying to exterminate a litter of unwanted shepherd-mix puppies. Bradford was shooting seven puppies on September 6, when one of the litter stood on his .38 caliber revolver's trigger and exacted revenge for the shooting deaths of three of the litter.

Authorities say Bradford was holding two puppies, one in his arms and another in his left hand, when the dog in his hand wiggled and put its paw on the trigger of the .38-caliber revolver forcing the gun to discharge. Bradford was treated at a hospital for a gunshot wound to his wrist.

Bradford indicated he decided to shoot the three-month-old shepherd-mix dogs in the head because he couldn't find them a home.

Escambia County Sheriff’s Deputies found three of the puppies in a shallow grave outside Bradford's home. The four other puppies and their mother appeared to be in good health and were taken by Escambia County Animal Control, which planned to make them available for adoption.

Authorities in Escambia Co. indicate that hundreds of calls have come in wanting to adopt the puppies and inquiring about the health and well being of the puppies. The authorities also report that no caller inquired about Bradford. Bradford faces charges of animal cruelty for killing three of the seven pups. No charges have been filed against the puppy who claimed self defense in the shooting incident.


A LOSS IN THE TRIBE; BOBBY BOWDEN’S GRANDSON KILLED IN STORM RELATED CRASH

Bowden Madden, a 15-year-old grandson of legendary FSU football coach Bobby Bowden, and his father, John Allen Madden, were killed in an accident on Interstate 10 during Hurricane Frances. The accident occurred on the night on Sept. 5, 2004, near Quincy, Florida, a city west of Tallahassee.

It appeared that the Maddens' car bumped a van as the two were heading west on the interstate. Due to the wet pavement caused by the storm, both vehicles veered across the highway median. The Maddens’ car then struck a Texas utility truck, driven by Danny Headley, heading into Florida to help with Hurricane Frances power outages.

John A. Madden was a former son-in-law of Bobby Bowden and a former Florida State center who was coached by Bowden. Madden married Bowden's daughter, Ginger, in 1981 and they were divorced earlier this year.

The accident occurred just days before the FSU Seminoles were scheduled to play Miami in their season opener, which had been postponed because of Hurricane Frances.

The Clarion Issue expresses its condolences to the Bowden and Madden families in their tragic loss of their loved ones.


The Nation           Back to Top


TWO NEW MEXICO COPS CHARGED IN THE LINE OF DUTY

Two police officers were struck by lightning while they were helping motorists on New Mexico’s state road 206 while the road was flooded by a thunderstorm. Both men stayed on the job and continued helping motorists until the water started to recede.

Officers Clint Varnell and Lance Bateman were sent to help people in about 15 vehicles stalled by a flash flood on July 20, 2004, about five miles south of Portales, in eastern New Mexico. Lt. Jimmy Glascock, a spokesperson for the New Mexico Police said, "Varnell took the direct hit of lightning and Bateman took a side hit of lightning." They were struck after rescuing a woman and three small children from a vehicle in a ditch.

Bateman indicated, "I was knocked off my feet and I don't remember much. I remember I was laying in the water when I came to and he [Varnell] was standing over me. We couldn't go anywhere anyway. The road was impassable for a while."

Officers Bateman and Varnell eventually drove themselves to the hospital in Portales and were transferred to Covenant Hospital in Lubbock, Texas, where they were treated.

"All I have is a headache and a sore shoulder," said Bateman, but he also stated that he did not consider his work heroic, he was "just earning my pay." Besides, he added: "We needed the rain."

The road where they had been working remained closed the next morning.

Portales farmer, Ralph Allison, admits he's never seen anything like the rain on June 20th in his 40 years living in New Mexico. Overnight a lake over 30 acres appeared on his 150-acre farm. "It rained and hailed awful... the worst I've ever seen." Allison said.


BUSH DECLARES WAR ON TERROR UNWINNABLE!

On August 30,2004, President George W. Bush declared the War on Terror unwinnable. In an interview on NBC-TV's “Today” show Bush was asked “Can we win?” the War on Terror. Bush then replied, “I don't think you can win it.” The interview was given as Bush was making his way to New York for the Republican National Convention. He left the studio for a campaign swing through New Hampshire and Michigan before arriving in New York.

The admission from Bush that the war was unwinnable provoked a response from Democratic Vice Presidential candidate John Edwards. Edwards said, “After months of listening to the Republicans base their campaign on their singular ability to win the war on terror, the president now says we can't win the war on terrorism.”

On August 27, 2004, Bush also admitted that he made a “miscalculation of what the conditions would be” in Iraq after the fall of dictator Saddam Hussein. That miscalculation has cost the US over 7000 causalities in Iraq, a battle in the War on Terror, that Pres. Bush now admits we can not win!

For over a year President Bush has said, “We are winning the War on Terror,” but now he admits that it is an unwinnable war!




FLAG FLAP AT INDIANA’S “SPRINGERVILLE” CAMPGROUND

In late May 2004, the city and mayor of Muncie, Indiana, banned all flags except the American and POW/MIA flag from Prairie Creek Reservoir campground, prompting a major fight between city officials and some campers. The city created the new rules at the city owned campground in response to complaints that the campground had become a taxpayer-subsidized, semi-permanent trailer park nicknamed “Springerville” after the Jerry Springer television show. The new flag rules were in response to complaints about the Confederate Battle Flags often displayed by individuals in the park and deemed offensive by some park visitors.

In May, Muncie Mayor Dan Canan indicated that he did not care that people were complaining that the ban violates their rights saying, “Their right is to go to another campground. We have a long waiting list for those campsites.”

But the Lord High Mayor (and Burghermasters) of Muncie forgot that this was America where the major remedy for any injury, real or imagined, was a lawsuit as American as attack ads during a political campaign. By summer, the Illinois Civil Liberties Union (ICLU) had filed a lawsuit on behalf of longtime camper Tommy Wallace, who says he is known as “the mayor of the Springerville” (unofficial of course). Wallace, a native of Hazard, Kentucky, had displayed a Confederate flag that measures 3 feet by 5 feet from his trailer at the campground for more than a decade. According to ICLU attorney Kenneth Falk, “Mr. Wallace displays the flag as a symbol of his heritage inasmuch as he is from the Southern part of the United States. It seems fairly clear that the city is attempting to do something it cannot do, which is restrict speech.” Falk said in the lawsuit that city officials threatened to evict Wallace if he did not remove the flag. The lawsuit alleges that the ban is a violation of the First Amendment.

But, Mayor Dan Canan is a great and fair guy, and like the Clarion Issue, he is an equal opportunity abuser. On August 23rd, he banned all flags from “Springerville” including the Stars and Stripes, commonly called Ol’ Glory, and MIA/POW flags.

Veterans groups and individuals rose in arms and forced the mayor to rescind the order the next day. The ban made national news the week before Republican convention opened in New York City. Canan said, “I have been here nine years, and I am not a perfect individual. I cannot explain why I missed the larger picture.” Canan sent out a new policy to Prairie Creek campers encouraging them to fly American and MIA/POW flags and apologizing for “banning all flags.” “I now realize that my decision was made in haste and was an error on my part,” the mayor of Moncie wrote in the flier. “Men and women have fought and died for our flag and my decision was wrong.”

Maybe the Mayor of Muncie was just ‘out Mayored’ by the “mayor of Springerville” (unofficial of course).

Yet, the original ban on other flags, including the Confederate Battle Flag, is still on, and it appears that “the mayor of Springerville” (unofficial of course) still plans to take on the Mayor of Muncie, mano y mano, (or maybe, bandera y bandera) in court. The original lawsuit challenged the fact that the mayor had selectively banned flags, excepting the US and now that the ban on the US flag has been lifted, the ICLU suit can proceed as filed.


INFAMOUS DUEL REENACTED BY DESCENDENTS OF AARON BURR AND ALEXANDER HAMILTON

Two hundred years after the famous (or infamous) duel between then Vice President Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton, a founding father (or founding person to be politically correct) and America’s first Secretary of the Treasury, the families finally met to reenact the duel. The families met at Weehawken, New Jersey, the site of the original duel on July 11, 1804. The reenactment was held on July 11, 2004, 200 years after the historic, but tragic event.

Antonio Burr, a psychologist and distant cousin of the historical Burr, portrayed the role of Aaron Burr. Antonio Burr said the intention was to draw publicity to the Burr family’s belief that “the way Aaron Burr has been vilified (in American history) obscures the contributions he made to the founding of the United States. Burr was one of the losers in history. I am devoted to setting the record straight.” Despite many achievements, Aaron Burr has never recovered from the stain on his reputation caused by killing Alexander Hamilton in the duel.

Douglas Hamilton, a great-grandson of Alexander Hamilton and a computer salesman from Columbus, Ohio, played the role of Hamilton. Alexander Hamilton was an aide to Gen. George Washington during the American Revolution. He attended the Constitutional Convention as a delegate from New York and served as a close adviser to Washington in his cabinet. As Sec. of the Treasury, Hamilton helped put the new republic on secure financial ground. His picture appears on the ten-dollar bill. Douglas Hamilton stated that, “Hamilton had it right and history has proved it.” He indicated that he was happy to play his illustrious ancestor in the reenactment.

During the reenactment, Antonio Burr arrived by rowboat in period costume and fired a replica of the .54-caliber pistol that mortally wounded Hamilton. Douglas Hamilton, also attired in 1804 regalia, fired his pistol and then feigned the historic hip wound by dropping to one knee and then falling to the ground in a sitting position.

The event was the families’ first meeting in two centuries. An estimated 60 descendants of Hamilton attended the event, as did 40 members of the Aaron Burr Association. After the reenactment of the duel, the Hamilton and Burr families attended a ceremony in Hamilton Park where two new plaques honoring Burr and Hamilton were dedicated.

The events that led to the duel in 1804 were as old as the republic. Both men had served in the army during the Revolution and had become rivals in New York politics. As national political parties developed after the US Constitution was ratified in 1789, Burr and Hamilton found themselves at opposite ends of the political spectrum.

Burr was a traditional American of the period. He saw himself as a New Yorker first, an American second. Hamilton, however, was a nationalist and envisioned an America free of petty state quarrels and regional interest. He believed in America, in its totality, first. The rivalry eventually turned from political disagreement into personal discord between the two New Yorkers.

In 1800 Thomas Jefferson ran as the Republican candidate against Federalist candidate and incumbent president John Adams. Burr was the Republican vice presidential candidate. Through a quirk in the electoral process, the election was thrown into the House of Representatives. In the House, the Federalists had enough votes to keep Jefferson from winning a majority, and they kept voting for Burr. The election went on for 36 ballots. Hamilton disliked Jefferson politically, but he considered Burr a political opportunist, had come to loath and abominate Burr. Hamilton used his influence to persuade the one representative from New Jersey to switch his vote to Jefferson. Jefferson won the election. Burr and Jefferson would never get along after the election of 1800 debacle, and Burr never forgave Hamilton for his interference in the election.

In early 1804, Burr ran for governor of New York, and Hamilton denounced him as untrustworthy. Burr lost and later complained about a newspaper article that reported Hamilton had expressed a “despicable opinion” of him. Dissatisfied with Hamilton’s explanation, Burr, who was still vice president, challenged him to the duel. Some historians believe the rift went even deeper, and that Hamilton had accused Burr of incest with his daughter, Theodosia, with whom Burr was very close.

Dueling was illegal in New York, but it had not been outlawed in New Jersey. The contestants crossed the river to Weehawken, New Jersey, where the duel occurred. During the duel Hamilton fired first and hit a tree. Burr fired and hit Hamilton in the leg.

Hamilton returned to New York, where he died the next day. Hamilton is said to have forgiven Aaron Burr on his deathbed. Ironically, Hamilton had furnished the pistols used during the 1804 duel.

After the duel and death of Hamilton, Burr was indicted for the murder by a New York grand jury even though the duel took place in New Jersey. The charge was later reduced to accessory to dueling and he escaped punishment. Burr fled south, but later returned to Washington, DC and served out his term as vice president. Thomas Jefferson had dropped Burr from the Republican ticket of 1804 and Burr left office heading west for the adventure that would see him charged with treason.

In 1805-06 Burr and a group of men traveled down the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers, meeting with political leaders and military officers on the way. President Jefferson was convinced that Burr was trying to take territory from the United States or Spain in order to create a country for himself to rule. Burr was arrested for treason in Alabama and placed on trial for treason. Burr was acquitted and went into European exile for years.

Burr returned to the United States in 1812. He never recovered politically, socially, or financially from the duel with Hamilton or the charge of treason. He died in 1836, broken and poor, in a hotel room on Staten Island, New York.

Burr’s family wants to rehabilitate their ancestor and see his role in American history restored to his propre place. Despite his accomplishments, Burr’s life viewed with suspicion and animosity. He is remembered in history books for the election of 1800, the duel with Hamilton, and the Burr conspiracy, and he is portrayed as the villain in all of these events. Only a few people realize that Burr was an officer in the Revolution, he championed equal education for women, and he founded an investment company that became Chase Manhattan Bank.

Hamilton’s place in American history is well sealed; however, the most noted Hamilton memorial, his spot on the ten-dollar bill, is currently under threat. Since the death of President Ronald Reagan, supporters have proposed putting Reagan's face, instead of Hamilton’s, on the ten-dollar bill.


SHARK REPELLENT MAY SOON BE AVAILABLE

Researchers say they are conducting tests on a potential shark repellant at the Bimini Biological Field Station in the Bahamas. According to Samuel Gruber, a University of Miami marine biologist and shark expert, “We have something that really works,” but he added that a lot of research still remains on the project.

The repellent, called A-2 because it was the second recipe tried, is derived from extracts of dead sharks. It has long been noted that sharks stay away if they smell a dead shark. Eric Stroud, a 30-year-old chemical engineer from Oak Ridge, New Jersey, and lead researcher on the project said, “It works very, very well. You introduce this chemical, and they all leave.” Stroud gathered a lot of the original A-2 ingredients at New Jersey fish markets and piers.

Tests have found the repellent effective on four species of sharks: the Caribbean reef, blacknose, nurse and lemon sharks. Studies are needed on other major man-eating species such as the great white, mako and oceanic whitetip. Gruber said the repellent, yellowish substance, seems to carry a chemical messenger that triggers a flight reaction in sharks. Within seconds of inducing the chemical, the sharks jerk their snouts away and vanish. A dose of 4 fluid ounces is enough to scare away feeding sharks, keeping them away from a fish head for two hours with just a few drops per minute. The researchers indicate that more studies are needed to pinpoint the active molecule among a dozen or so in A-2.

In May 2004, Stroud, Gruber and other members of the A-2 team, presented their work during a meeting of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists in Norman, Oklahoma. They have a patent pending and are starting a company, Shark Defense Inc., to eventually market the repellent. Stroud and his researchers work in a New Jersey warehouse. He is backed by donations of less than $500,000 from two private benefactors.

An effective shark repellant has eluded scientists for decades. Shark repellent research began during World War II, when the U.S. Navy created “Shark Chaser” for sailors adrift and downed pilots. It was mixed with black dye and made of copper acetate, which scientists thought would smell like a rotting shark. Studies later showed it wasn't that effective.

In 1972 a University of Maryland shark expert, Eugenie Clark, discovered that a Red Sea fish, the Moses sole, secreted a milky substance that repelled sharks. However, the repellent derived from the sole wasn't practical because it had to be squirted into a shark's mouth to be effective. Clark’s research helped convince scientist that a shark repellant could be found.

If A-2 proves effective and marketable, it will be a major source of protection for swimmers, surfers, and beach goers around the world. While the danger of attack is extremely slight, the International Shark Attack File, at the Florida Museum of Natural History, recorded 55 unprovoked attacks worldwide in 2003. These attacks included four deaths.

 


MIKE WALLACE ARRESTED IN NEW YORK

CBS news patriarch Mike Wallace, famous for his appearances on the newsmagazine “60 Minutes,” was arrested for disorderly conduct in New York on August 10, 2004. The incident occurred during a confrontation after Wallace emerged from a midtown Manhattan restaurant to find the two Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) officers questioning the driver of his car. According to the police, the car was double-parked. Wallace, who is 86, was handcuffed and hauled to a police station.

TLC spokesman Allan Fromberg said Wallace approached the inspectors and became “overly assertive and disrespectful,” interfering with their ability to perform their duties. The inspectors said they asked Wallace to step away from the car. Wallace refused to move and lunged at one of the inspectors. Fromberg went on to explain that “the other inspector feared for his partner's safety.”

Wallace had a good laugh at the accusation saying, “I'm an 86-year-old man. For whatever reason, this guy and his buddy were intent upon telling me that I was interfering with the execution of the law.” Wallace asserted his innocence and denied that he had lunged at any officer.

Luigi Militello, the manager of Luke's Restaurant and a witness to the incident, said that the inspectors had definitely “manhandled” Wallace.

Wallace indicated that it was the first time he had been in handcuffs since the 1968 Democratic convention, when he was arrested while covering a Vietnam War protest. He will have his day in court in October.


EPA ANNOUNCES FISH ADVISORIES

On August 29, 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its 12th straight summary of information on locally issued fish advisories and safe-eating guidelines. This information is provided to EPA annually by individual states. The States monitor their waters by sampling fish tissue for long-lasting pollutants that accumulate in the fish found in their boundaries.

More than one-third of the nation's lakes and nearly one-fourth of its rivers contain fish that may be contaminated with mercury, dioxin, PCB, and pesticide pollution.

The number of fish advisories is increasing. In 2003, 48 states and the District of Columbia issued 3,094 fish advisories, 280 more than in 2002. With these additions, 35 percent of the total lake acres and 24 percent of the river miles in the nation are now under advisory. Since 2002, the number of lake acres under an advisory increased by two percent, river miles by nine percent and coastline by four percent. A large part of the increase in lake acres and river miles under advisory occurred in Montana and Washington, which issued statewide advisories for all their lakes and rivers in 2003. Hawaii issued a statewide advisory for its entire coastline.

States usually issue fish consumption advisories if elevated concentrations of chemicals such as mercury or dioxin are found in local fish. As new waters are tested and results added to previous years’ findings, the number of fish advisories continues to rise.

A proposal by the Bush administration earlier this year seeks require utilities to cut mercury emissions by 70 percent by 2018, a deadline environmentalists say is too generous to the industry and too risky for public health. The nation's 1,100 coal-burning utility plants emit about 48 tons of mercury annually, making them the largest unregulated U.S. source of the toxic substance.

This year, 21 states, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey, had statewide advisories for mercury in freshwater lakes and rivers. In Maine, House Speaker Patrick Colwell indicated that “89 percent of the fish sampled had levels of mercury that were above what the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) deems safe to consume. He added, “action needs to be taken now to prevent irreparable damage to our ecosystem.”

Environmentalists in North Carolina feel partially hard hit. They contend that a Bush administration proposal to regulate mercury from power plant emissions ignores more than 60 other toxins that threaten public health, many of them emitted from 14 coal-fired plants in North Carolina. The Bush proposal would allows the continued release of high levels of the pollutants in North Carolina, including tens of thousands of tons of arsenic, lead, dioxins, and other pollutants, according to a report commissioned by a coalition of environmental advocacy groups.

Environmentalist groups described the latest figures as very troubling. According to Felice Stadler of the National Wildlife Federation, “From Maine to Montana, from Florida to Washington, people can't eat the fish they catch without risk.”


 

The World

ENGLISH ONLY CLASSROOM INCLUDES THE MUTT
(THE MOST UNHEARD OF THING WE’VE EVER HEARD OF)

A blind student may sue the Canadian university that denied him entry to English classes. While Yvan Tessier, a French speaking Canadian who needed to learn English, was willing to speak English in the class, his guide dog responded only to French commands. Tessier was turned away from an English immersion course at the University of New Brunswick because he would be forced to give his dog, Pavot, instructions in French. Students in the course are expected to communicate only in English, at all times, during the intensive five-week course. That includes talking to the dog.

Tessier, who is from Fredericton, New Brunswick, indicated, “I feel a little bit frustrated and sad about the situation. They don’t have the openness of spirit to understand that it’s better for me and my mobility to operate with my guide dog. It’s only 17 commands in French, it won’t compromise the English program.”

The black Labrador retriever has guided Tessier, a graduate student, for the past two years. Pavot was trained by the Quebec-based Mira Foundation specifically for French speaking clients. “We were astonished by this,” said Pierre Noiseux, a spokesman at the foundation that placed Pavot with Tessier. “The dog doesn’t speak French or English. He doesn’t know how to spell ’en avant.’ He doesn’t know it’s French. He just knows that ’en avant’ means forward.”

The university said it turned Tessier away because it did not have enough time to prepare for his special needs. It said he can join the program once Pavot learns English commands. In a television interview a university spokeswoman said, “In the past, the service has been provided that we do teach their guide dogs commands in English, so the dog learns English as well.”

Tessier and Pavot’s trainers said it would take too long to teach Pavot English commands. The Mira Foundation said it was also dangerous to teach the dog new commands just as Tessier arrives in unfamiliar surroundings. “He’s in a new city, he needs a dog that will be really alert,” Noiseux said. “Sure we could take the dog, bring him back and recode. But why would I do that? The guy is French.”

In an unrelated incident, election officials in the western provinces of Canada were warning voters not to eat their ballots during the federal election held in late June.

The warning stemmed from the arrest of three Alberta men who were charged with eating their paper ballots during Canada's last federal election, in 2000. The members of the Edible Ballot Society were protesting against what they said was a lack of real choice among candidates.

The issue was of sufficient concern to warrant its inclusion in the site’s “Frequency asked Questions” section, above answers to such inquiries as “Why should I vote?” and “Am I registered?” “Eating a ballot, not returning it or otherwise destroying or defacing it constitutes a serious breach of the Canada Elections Act,” Elections Canada warns on its Internet site.

The Clarion Issue believes that the United States should consider returning to paper ballots- maybe strawberry flavored.

Ballot instructions: 1) Circle your choice for office. 2) Please do not eat your ballot!



WEAPONS OF GRASS DESTRUCTION FOUND IN ENGLAND

It wasn’t NASCAR, and it wasn’t as exciting as the Annual Cheese Chase, but for the participants and spectators at the annual lawnmower race in Pullsborough, England, it was the next best thing.

For twelve hours on August 2ed, the drivers and pit crews of England’s Lawnmower race battled in a grueling overnight race in their customized “Weapons of grass destruction” to see which machine could cover the 286 mile course the fastest.

Each team was allowed three rotating drivers and a pit crew. For the race, the mowers had their blades removed.

The race was won by the Cupid Stunts Racing team.

Before the race, Hans Blix inspected every “Weapon of Grass Destruction” and reported that no blades were found on the mowers or with the pit crews. The race was captured on film and will be released as a 3 DVD set later in the year. A spokesperson for People for Ethical Plant Treatment (dot) Org (PEPTO) was proud to announce that no grass was injured during the running or filming of the race.

There was no indication when lawnmower racing will be added to Olympic competition.

 


MUNCH’S SCREAM SNATCHED FROM AN OSLO MUSEUM

A version of Edvard Munch’s masterpiece “The Scream” and another famous painting by the same artist was stolen from an Oslo museum by two armed and hooded robbers on Sunday, August 22, 2004.

Witnesses indicated and police verified that the two armed art thieves struck Oslo’s Munch Museum in a bold daylight raid while it was packed with tourists. The two masked robbers ran into the Museum, threatened the staff with a handgun, and forced people to lie down before grabbing “The Scream” and “Madonna.” According to witnesses the men yanked the masterpieces from the wall, walked out the front door, and escaped in a black Audi car driven by a third man who had been waiting outside. Stunned tourists said they feared they were victims of a terrorist attack.

The paintings were later cut from their frames, which were found smashed and scattered in an Oslo street. The car was found abandoned a few miles away.

Munch, a great Norwegian artist and one of the founders of modern expressionism, lived from 1863 to 1944. He grew up in Christiania (later Oslo), Norway. He lost his mother and sister to tuberculosis while he was very young and impressionable and his father was mentally ill. The death and mental illness in his family profoundly affected Munch.

Munch studied at the Royal School of Design of Christiania. While in Oslo, Munch became a member of ‘Christiania's Bohemia,’ a group that was concerned with political, social, and ethical questions. This group was named after the novel Christiania's Bohemia by Hans Jaeger, an anarchist and a leader of the group. In 1889, Munch traveled to Paris to study on a government scholarship. It was there that Munch was exposed to the Impressionist works, which laid the groundwork for the School of Expressionism. Munch’s paintings echo deep personal statements about his troubled life. Munch is quoted as saying, “Sickness, insanity, and death were the angels that surrounded my cradle and they have followed me throughout my life.”

The “Scream” and “Madonna” were painted as parts of a series about love, anguish, and death. Other important works by Munch include: “Vampire,” “The Sick Child,” and “The Dance of Life.”

Art experts speculate the thieves might demand a ransom because the works are too well known to be sold on the open market. One Norwegian art expert estimated “The Scream” would bring $60-$75 million if legally sold at auction while “Madonna” would sell for over $14 million.


CAPED CRUSADER HANGS OUT WITH QUEEN

On September 13, 2004, 33 year old father Jason Hatch used a ladder to climb up to the ledge next to the main balcony of Buckingham Palace where he unfurled and hung a banner saying: "Super Dads of Fathers 4 Justice. Fighting for your right to your kids." Super Dads may have been an understatement as Hatch was dressed as the Superhero, Batman. A five hour standoff developed as police cordoned off the area and tried to coax the protester down. The stand off ended when Hatch surrendered to police after ample photos had been taken by British and international news agencies.

Hatch and his accomplice Dave Pyke (48), dressed as Robin for the occasion, climbed a ladder in to the palace grounds at about 1:45 p.m. Hatch indicated in a later interview that, “The only security was a four-foot fence. We used a ladder to get onto the roof of a palace building which was just 10 yards from the road.” It was “unbelievably easy” he said for the pair to get into the palace grounds. Pyke agreed to come down when police shooters on top of the building threatened to open fire if he continued climbing.

Eventually Hatch felt that he had made his point and got onto a cherry picker the police had brought in. After he was eased to the ground Hatch was rushed into a police van amid cheers from onlookers, many of them fellow protestors that had created the diversion on the other side of the palace that allowed Hatch and Pyke to enter the palace grounds. One observer noted that he could have stayed longer but probably needed to come down to use the batroom.

Hatch was a member of Fathers 4 Justice, a group that represents fathers who never get time with their children even though the courts have ruled they can see and visit their children. Matt O'Connor, who set up Fathers 4 Justice, said Hatch was prepared to go to prison for the cause. “He has not seen his children pretty much since they were born,” O'Connor said. “He has been to court and got court orders but they have not been enforced. He's been back time and time again and like a lot of guys he had just had enough.”

Fathers 4 Justice, founded in 2002, has become more vocal and daring in its protests lately. One of its members was charged Sunday with creating a public nuisance after he climbed the London Eye, the jumbo Ferris wheel on the banks on the River Thames, dressed as Spider Man.

Hatch and Pike were freed the next day; however palace officials promised tighter security after the prank.

Queen Elizabeth II and many of the royal family were on holiday at Balmoral Castle in the Scottish Highlands and were never in any danger. There was no comment from the palace authorities on the whereabouts of Camilla Parker Bowells during the incident involving the ‘Dynamic Duo.”


CHESS KING BOBBY FISCHER CHECKMATED BY AUTHORITIES AFTER A 12-YEAR STALEMATE

Bobby Fischer, former world chess champion, was arrested and held in Japan at Tokyo's Narita airport after trying to leave Japan with a cancelled passport on July 16, 2004. The 61-year-old chess expert, widely considered one of the sport’s most brilliant minds, has been wanted in the United States since 1992 for breaking an international embargo on the former Yugoslavia in 1992.

Fischer’s problems stem from his exhibition battle in Yugoslavia with the Soviet Union's Boris Spassky, which earned him $3.5-million. Yugoslavia at the time was a federation unraveling in civil war, and Fischer’s appearance violated United Nations sanctions and an American business embargo signed by President George H.W. Bush (41). Fischer, who was reportedly broke at the time due to his eccentric lifestyle, came out of retirement to play the rematch with his long time Russian rival.

But Fischer’s problems with the US government runs far deeper than his refusal to abide by President Bush’s (41) ban. Fischer has been exceedingly critical of American policies on his personal web site and in radio interviews delivered from various points of exile. His philosophy has been punctuated by ferocious anti-Jewish diatribes, despite the fact his mother was Jewish. In an interview on Philippine radio on Sept. 11, 2001, Fischer exulted in the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, praising the horrific events as “wonderful news,” and declaring that America got what it deserved for supporting Israel. Fischer indicated that, “I want to see the U.S. wiped out.”

Since 1992 Fischer has traveled frequently between Tokyo, Hungary, and the Philippines. Fischer frequently passed through immigration controls, and in 2002, he bragged to a radio interviewer that the “U.S. hasn't got the guts to catch me.” Fischer’s passport was revoked in December 2003. Fischer's passport was accepted as valid when he entered Japan on April 15 on a 90-day visa, but he was detained when he tried to leave in July.

Bobby Fischer was born on March 9, 1943, in Chicago. His father was the German physicist, Robert James Fischer. After his parents divorced, his mother moved to Brooklyn, New York. At the age of six his elder sister introduced him to chess which swiftly became his one and only passion. At 14, he won junior and senior US championships. A year later Fischer became the youngest contender for a world championship. In 1959, he dropped out of school, deeming it a waste of time, to turn professional. His IQ reportedly was higher than that of Albert Einstein. His success as a child prodigy and his impressive earnings helped earn him star status. After a poor showing in 1962, he accused the Soviets of conspiring against him and soon thereafter joined a sect called the Worldwide Church of God.

In 1968 he began a year-and-a-half time-out to prepare to take on Soviet rivals who had dominated the chess world since 1948. His comeback was successful, and his showdown with Spassky at the 1972 world championships in Reykjavik, Iceland, marked the height of his career.

Fischer became a symbol in the United States of the Cold War-era struggle against communism. His victories over the communist chess champions drew more attention to chess than at any time before or since. However, in 1975 Fischer contested federation rules for the game, and lost his title to Soviet Anatoly Karpov. For 15 years, nothing could lure him back into international chess. By 1990, Fischer was broke and needed the money a rematch (or “revenge match”) with against Spassky would provide. In 1992 he accepted the invitation (and three million dollars the match provided) even though the match was to be held in Montenegro, Yugoslavia, despite the UN and Presidential embargo in effect at the time.

After the 1992 rematch, US authorities charged him with a transaction in violation of sanctions and issued an arrest warrant. Fischer became an American exile and virtual recluse. Fischer traveled often between Europe and Asia particularly to the Philippines and Japan where he often lived for extended periods. He avoided most contact with the media but posted editorials critical of American policy on his web site.

During Fischer’s Japanese detention he began appealing for political asylum in a “friendly third country,” according to postings on the web site ChessBase .com. Another web site, established by Miyoko Watai, the head of the Japan Chess Association and a ‘great and good friend’ of Fischer, indicated that Fischer did not want to return to the Jewish-controlled United States where he would face “a kangaroo court, 10 years in Federal prison, and a likely early demise or worse on trumped up political charges.” The site added, “Nor does he wish to remain in a hostile, brutal, and corrupt US-controlled Japan.”

After a two-day hearing in late July, Japanese immigration officials rejected Fischer’s appeal against deportation for attempting to travel on the invalid US passport. At the hearing Fischer labeled his detention “a kidnapping,” indicated that he had been “seized,” and had been subjected to a completely illegal procedure on both the American side and the Japanese side.”

In early August Fischer appealed the Japanese deportation ruling hoping to obtain a German passport, based on the fact that his dead father was German. However, if Fischer asserts his right to German citizenship, he could face arrest in Germany because he has publicly denied the Holocaust ever took place.

On August 6th Fischer submitted a letter to the U.S. embassy in Tokyo announcing his intent to renounce his U.S. citizenship. According to a Fischer spokesperson, “Bobby Fischer is sick and tired of how he has been treated by the U.S. for the past 12 years. The letter is a statement of renunciation of U.S. citizen ship by Bobby Fischer, and he issues that statement unilaterally.” On the same day Fischer's Japanese attorney, Masako Suzuki, filed suit against Tokyo immigration officials seeking to overturn cancellation of his permission to land in Japan and the deportation order.

A few days later on Aug. 10th, Fischer’s former rival, Spassky, wrote President George W. Bush asking that he show mercy toward Fischer by not seeking his extradition. Spassky told Bush that if Fischer were extradited and convicted he'd like to go to jail with Bobby Fischer as long as they could take along a chess set. Spassky indicated that, “Bobby and myself committed the same crime. Put sanctions against me also. Arrest me. And put me in the same cell with Bobby Fischer, and give us a chess set.”

On the same day Spassky sent the letter to Pres. Bush, Japanese immigration authorities transferred Fischer from the Immigration Bureau facilities at Narita International Airport in Tokyo to the East Japan Immigration Center in Ushiku. This move indicated Fischer’s stay in Japan would be prolonged.

On August 17th, Miyoki Watai, president of the Japanese Chess Association, announced that she and Fischer intended to get married. She announced that they had had a long-term romantic relationship and had been “living together as man and wife” for the past four years. The couple indicated that they hoped that the marriage would help them get back to a normal life. However, other Fischer watchers have indicated that the marriage move just may be a real life instance of Fischer “queening a pawn” in his bid for freedom.

On August 20th, despite his pending nuptials to Miyoki Watai, a Tokyo court rejected Fischer’s request to stop deportation procedures. On that same day, the American embassy agreed to send a representative to visit Fischer in detention at Ushiku so he could renounce his US citizenship by telling a official face to face as required by law. Later that day, Fischer spoke to a Philippine radio station from his detention center. Fischer said, “Hopefully, I'll be out of this stinking hole soon,” and he littered the hour-long phone interview with anti-Semitic and anti-American remarks. During the interview, when Fischer was asked to talk about “pleasant things,” Fischer said: “Here's something pleasant. I want to talk about the destruction of the USA.” He went on to criticize America’s foreign policy. The former chess champion also lashed out at Japan for getting involved in Iraq and the Philippines for its high crime rate.

Four days later, the Japanese justice ministry, headed by Daizo Nozawa, rejected Bobby Fischer's request for protection as a political refugee saying, “the charges outstanding against him in the United States are not political in nature.” Fischer was informed that he would be deported immediately. Fischer’s lawyer filed for an injunction against Fischer’s deportation as soon as she learned the government had rejected the appeal for political asylum.

However, by the end of August Japanese authorities had decided to deport Fischer. Fischer again told Philippines radio that he would be “tried, convicted, sentenced, imprisoned, tortured, and murdered” if Japan deported him to America. Fischer went on to add, “I spent $350,000 here in Japan. I gave them my time, I gave them my money, spent a fortune going to Japanese mineral baths. But just one call from the US embassy and they are sending me to prison in the US to die.”

On Sept. 8 a Japanese court issued another stay in Fischer’s deportation pending its decision in another hearing on the case. At the time the Clarion Issue went to press Fischer was still in Japan awaiting the final disposition of his case. There had been no official announcements of a date for the marriage between Fischer and Miyoki Watai, Fischer’s ‘bride to be.’ Authorities had refused to grant a marriage application due to the lack of necessary documentation, including Fischer's passport.

Fischer, the legendary enfant terrible of chess, has been known as an eccentric for a long time. At times Fischer’s movements over the last ten years have been hard to trace. During the rematch in Yugoslavia with Spassky, Fischer demanded that the toilet seat in his hotel room be higher than any other toilet seat in the hotel. However, there were have been no comments from Miyoki Watai about the toilet height arrangements in the couple’s planned love nest.


 

Clarion Issue Trivia


A major member of the ‘Coalition of the Willing’ is Eritrea. Where is Eritrea?

1.
2. In the Caribbean Sea
3. Near the Black Sea
4. On the coast of the Red Sea
5. Central Africa
6. Polynesia
Near New Guinea

Answer C. Eritrea was once the coastal area if Ethiopia that separated from that ancient country in 1993. Its capital is Asmara. Eritrea has a population of about 4.5 million people in a country of 46,842 square miles. Ethiopia is also a member of the ‘Coalition of the Willing.’

 


OUR ON LINE SPONSORS

Barber Fertilizer www.barberfertilizer.com

Barber Fertilizer
1011 Airport Rd

Bainbridge, GA 39817
TollFree: (800) 333-7967

www.stmaryswelcome.com

 

The Southern Calendar

SEPTEMBER

Third weekend

Warwick, Ga. Casi Chili and Rib Cookoff www.gritsfest.com or

email vann @gritsfest.com

OCTOBER

All month Octoberfest at Helen, Ga. A German celebration in the Alpine Village of North Georgia. 800-858-8027 e-mail info@helenga.org http://www.helenga.org/

First weekend Rock Shrimp Festival at St. Marys. Ga.

A small town festival serving Rock Shrimp. Crafts, food, entertainment. On the coast on the Ga/Fla boundary. www.stmaryswelcome.com/events .

Mid October Biketoberfest at Daytona, Fla. www.biketoberfest.com & www.bketoberfest.org

Third weekend Alabama 500 at Talladega Superspeedway, Talladega, Ala. www.nascar.com

NOVEMBER

First Saturday Mule Day at Calvary, Ga. A small town country festival. Mules, food, parade, arts & crafts etc. Located south of Cairo, Ga. (229- 377-3636). www.bainbridgegachamber.com click on festivals

Second weekend Battle of Secessionville, S.C.

A Civil War reenactment at Secessionville, S.C. The reenactment is at Boone Hall Plantation outside Charleston, S.C. E-mail marlow616@aol.com . Reenactment info and history of the battle is part of the Civil War @ Charleston web site.

Pennzoil 400 Homestead-Miami Speedway outside Miami, Fla www.nascar.com

Third weekend NAPA 500 at Atlanta Motor Speedway Atlanta, Ga. www.nascar.com

Saturday after Thanksgiving Swine Time at Climax, Ga.

A small town country festival serving all types of food including pork. Arts & crafts, 5-K run, parade entertainment. Climax, Ga. is located between Bainbridge and Thomasville, Ga. on Hwy. 84. (229-246-0910) www.swinetimefestival.com or www.bainbridgegachamber.com click on festivals


TO PLACE YOUR TOWN’S EVENT ON THE SOUTHERN CALENDAR
Email the information to: apearson@ClarionIsh.com

Back to Top