Web Porn and Web Predators with Domain Names:
A New Form of Threats to Children?:
BellSouth Intellectual v. Norman
February 26, 2006

U.S. Supreme Court Link

click here to tell Supreme Court that you are concerned about
Web Domain Names and Child Domain Names

Affront to Children with Adult Web Pages

A recent case in the U.S. Supreme Court

from Valdosta and Moultrie , Georgia,
shows just how far the public decency has fallen since 2000. The case was concerned with whether or not foreign Web advertisers during 2003 and 2004 were violating federal law in their apparent use of child-like domain names to link to adult Web sites:

3littlepig.com pen**dance.com
midnightpu***.com

Truth in Domain Names Act, April 2003:
Do Not Mix Childrens' Domains with Porn

Since April 2003, U.S. federal law under the Truth in Domain Names Act, TIDNA, had generally forbidden the use of child-like domain names link to adult Web sites. Thus such domain names as Easter-Bunnies.Net would have generally been prevented from linking to pornographic Web sites.
Any normal business would never have even considered such outrageous use of the very words which children are likely to use in their beginning Web learning.

Yet in February 2006, even words such as:

12yearoldf**k.com

were in active use, tying both pornographic word and regular business into a single Web page. It is quite possible that this last use of domain names can be seen as encouraging child molestation.

History of The Case

In the fall of 2001, BellSouth Intellectual Property Company (BIPCO) began their attempt to take a domain name from me using the Federal
Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 . BIPCO's claim of dilution was damaged by March 2003 Moseley v. Victoria's Secret U.S. Supreme Court decision, requiring actual proof of 'dilution', not the simple 'likelihood' .. On April 3, 2003 BIPCO filed a motion claiming that I had failed to divulge data on a company, Everyone.Net, when in fact BIPCO had listed Everyone.Net on at least 2 pages of their original complaint. My then lawyer failed to defend this action and on April 26, 2003 the judge allowed BIPCO basically to derail the case. Since the statements made in the April 3, 2003 motion seemed false prima facia by BIPCO's own text, and since this motion prevented my case from every being heard, I claimed in 2005 that a 'fraud upon the court' had occurred.

As I proceeded with the case in October 2003, I discovered apparent connections between BellSouth and Ultimate Search of Hong Kong, over the taking of another domain name, 'southernbelle.net'. Ultimate Search had claimed in another domain name case, bigot.com, that it was engaged in pornography. As previously mentioned, one domain owned by Ultimate Search, '3littlepig.com' was linked during part of 2003 to various adult Web sites, and appeared to be violating the Truth in Domain Names Act. This law basically forbade the use of child-like domains to adult Web sites.

Useless Telling to Courts, FBI, Department of Justice and
Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services

These TIDNA violations have been reported to probably dozens of state,
local and federal officials, from a U.S. Court Judge , to the 11th http://www.appealscourt.net in Atlanta, Georgia, and finally to the U.S. Supreme Court Judges . FBI agents in Atlanta , the Innocent Images office in Washington, DC and various DOJ Attorneys , have been called and/or visited directly. As well, my former employer New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services was given reports on this apparent Web linking of porn and children.

Useless Telling to Republican and Democratic Politicians
in New York and Georgia

I hand-delivered these reports in October 2005 to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, in New York City. I attempted to give
this data to the New York State Attorney Generals Office in New York City in 2005, but was rudely rejected by Mr. Elliott Spitzer's lower Manhattan office. Republican House Member Mike Pence, was crucial in passing the 2003 TIDNA bill, but has thus far not been willing to look at these apparent TIDNA violations.

I contacted the Georgia Senate Pro Tem Eric Johnson's office in January 2004, but received no help whatever from a major Republican official in Georgia. During Fall 2005, I hand-delivered this data to Cathy Cox's office in Tifton, Georgia.

Useless Telling to Federal Courts in Georgia

Neither Judge Beverley Martin of Northern District Court of Georgia, nor Judge William Pryor of 11th Circuit Court,have been willing to look into this situation

Useless Telling to CBS, NBC, Atlanta Journal, WALB, WFXLin New York and Georgia

I hand-delivered this data to CBS News on West 57th Street in Manhattan and to NBC News
in the Rockefeller Center in October 2005. I hand-delivered the data to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the Fulton
Daily Reporter in Atlanta in January 2004. In both 2004 and 2005, I hand-delivered this data to the Moultrie Observer. I hand-delivered this data to Fox News Channel 31 in Albany, Georgia and WALB NBC affiliate in Albany, in fall 2005 and
winter 2006. I hand-delivered this data to the Wall Street Journal, in October 2005. I even hand-delivered this data to the David Letterman Late Night Show on 53rd Street and Broadway in October 2005.

Utter Failure of State and Federal Officials to Deal with Mixing of
Adult Business, General Business and Children on the Web

Thus far, no federal or state official has raised an accusing finger to protect American and Southern Children from Web child predators , even though the feds have various laws
to use including the TIDNA and the Child Online Protection Act . As well, each state now has some law relating to the contact of children with sexual materials.

The utter failure of any relevant state or federal official to deal with these apparent violations of the TIDNA, is an affront to public
decency and any 'normal' use of the Web domain name system to promote general business. Working state officials such as state patrols , county sheriffs and deputies were far more willing to at least look at the problem.

Use of Domain Names and Links on this Web Site

Please note, that all internal links on this Web site were created with domain names legally purchased under existing law. As existing law on domain names is being applied by the U.S.
Department of Justice and the F.B.I., these very domain names could have been linked directly to adult porn or logically even to child pornography itself.

My case in the U.S. Supreme Court, was appealed for the purpose of changing this inaccurate view by federal legal officials, as well as to protect my domain names. The external links were for information purposes.